2010 in review

Wow — WordPress really impressed me just now. It sent me (and all other WordPress bloggers) a 2010 review of my  blog and crunched it up in a fun way. Love it! Here it is:

———————————-

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads This blog is doing awesome!.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 1,700 times in 2010. That’s about 4 full 747s.

 

In 2010, there were 9 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 13 posts. There were 15 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 1mb. That’s about a picture per month.

The busiest day of the year was October 6th with 32 views. The most popular post that day was Why Do We Need Morality?.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were twitter.com, listorious.com, kommunikatsioon.com, hootsuite.com, and 74.125.67.100.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for descartes, morality, why do we need morality, kairi soosaar, and soviet union propaganda.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

1

Why Do We Need Morality? January 2010
6 comments

2

Meditations of Descartes December 2009

3

Political Culture in Estonia March 2010
2 comments

4

PR and Propaganda February 2010

5

in Love with iPad January 2010

Political Culture in Estonia

Political Culture can be defnined and looked at from a number of perspectives and ways. It has been tried to be explained by many people who have given the term a different wording in hopes of hitting the nail-head. Therefore this paper only focuses on the fundamentals of the culture of Estonia which apply to politics, making it also– political culture. In Estonian society the same schools of thinking apply to politics as they do in everyday life of the citizens. The same pattern runs through people’s personal lives as they apply to the political spectrum. Estonians as a people, are very materialistic. Individuals are very success-driven, and people with skilljobs are looked down on. If one is financially secure and can show it off with an expensive car or a house, then it seems like his/her work is done, at the same time yearning for more and more. The same in politics, the main problem running through political discussions and messages forwarded to the public, whether it is recession or not, are budget, deficite, economic growth, economic bloom, wages, financial well-being. This kind of push to be extra successful and constant competition to strive to be more wealthy is a very masculin side of a society that prevails. The political sphere is all the time in a cock fight. In the media, parties are all the time trying to downsize the other parties while trying to show how big and strong they themselves are. Cock fighting is a natural instinct for men, especially in Estonian society. Since in this nation the relationship between a man and a woman is still very oldfashioned, meaning the man is the one who brings the bread and the woman is a homemaker, then women are in the background watching the men fight all their lives to show they are better and more successful than the man standing next to him. Men work so hard constantly without being satisfied with any level of success that they die at a young age of heart attacks. In politics also – we have less and more masculine politicians, but the one who is the most dominant and masculine in his politics, pushes his way through always . This also shows the individualistic approach to politics. Even though we have many parties which all consist of people driven by the same collective goal, then at the end the ones who push through are individuals who do not choose the means how they make it to the top. Politicians even change their whole beliefsystem in order to make it as individuals , and be successful and wealthy as individuals, not sacrifice their individual wealth and success for what is right and just for the well-being of the citizens of the nation. Estonian people are also mostly non-religious, which means there is no spiritual need for a greater power to lead them. Everyone fights for himself and everyone is his own farmer of success. Collectivity is something that pushes people away, probably stemming from the Soviet times, where collective workforce, people being treated like cattle, has taken its toll on the society – they think “never again”. After the break from the Soviet regime, the society is very Estonian-minded. They can finally be open and proud to be Estonians, whereas two decades ago they would have been jailed or killed for that. The desperate emotional need to preserve Estonian nationality and to keep the culture and the language alive can be misinterpreted by other nations as “nationalist” and which is what the Russian community is trying to smear Estonian politics with. Estonian political parties all have national ideologies, and all compete against the one party, Center Party, who wants to appear Estonia-focused, but is in fact focusing on the Russian community. Estonian color themes are prevailing in the parties’ campaigns, where sometimes it seems the parties are doing politics by “national symbols” and not focusing on actual problems that need to be tackled. Estoninan people generally are not very connected to the politics that the government and the parties so eargerly try to run in Toompea . The people have a tendency to think that they just leave the politics to the politicians, because whoever they vote for at the elections, does not win anyway. A large percentage of the people refuses to go voting or just does not care thinking nothing will change anyway. While the other group of people religiously vote and desperately believe in the government and their favored parties. The political culture in Estonia is materialistic, individualistic, nationalistic and masculine. And since the people of Estonia are not programmed to follow a leader, a great force, then it is difficult to make the people follow politics. This tendency will maybe change over generations, but as of now it is every man for himself, his success and his fight to be better than his neighbor while letting the politicians fight their own fights in Toompea, which he can later complain about but do nothing about it.

Sources:

  1. www.wikipedia.org
  2. Political Communication Compendium (Ülle Toode)
  3. www.vikerkaar.ee Article by Tõnis Saarts, Leif Kalev “ Poliitiline kultuur ja Eesti ühiskonna uuenemine”

PR and Propaganda

Even though public relations and propaganda  can be categorized in the same group, then it actually has to be made sure that PR is not labelled as propaganda. The two use information the same way and can both be misused.  A PR practitioner can’t say that they have never used propaganda style to persuade people, just as a propagandist cannot say they never practice public relations. There is a fine line in between the two.

There were times when  these two meant practically the same thing. The public did not have the same information flow they have now and believed anything that the news broadcasts or the newspapers said – because why wouldn’t they, right?  Why would the officials of the countries lie and why would the newspapers write something that is not how it actually is. The people high up, of course knew that and it was the perfect weapon for them to persuade the public into thinking whatever it was that they wanted them to think. Propaganda in the Soviet Union is a great example – masses of people were brainwashed by the propaganda that came from Moscow, the soviet party used words and falsified facts on paper to distort the image of the party for the better, so that these vast masses of people would think that it was the best country in the world. Even though everything around them was simply horrifying, most people thought it was still the best life they could ask for, and that the outside world was bad and full of evil. Fortunately there were a lot of people who saw the true colors of the red party. Propaganda worked very well, and public relations worked just like the party wanted. In those times, propaganda and PR crossed over so much that there was no distinct difference.

There in fact is a difference. In todays society we have so much information coming from all sides, and thanks to the internet and the mulitple languages we can speak, it is possible to read news published in Los Angeles, in Hong Kong, in Australia, in Moscow and in Cuba. From this vast information flow an educated person can detect straight away which of them is full of propaganda and which of them is an objective newspiece, because of the choice of media outlets. Today propaganda still exists of course, but can be distinguished greatly from PR, because the latter simply smooths the rough edges and paints a prettier picture, but does not paint over the actual truth –  it is not possible to hide your head under the sand in today’s society. Propaganda however just gives out false information to distort the mass’ minds.

PR, however, talks to the audience with moral and ethical code. They respect the public and don’t dehumanize like propaganda does. Propaganda simply  brainwashes people. That is not the intention of PR. The idea of public relations is to produce an actual dialogue, but propaganda does not seek that. PR strives for understanding, but propaganda –  for following.

PR uses truthfulness and openness to persuade its audience. Only with that, a normal dialogue can be formed. So PR is always in favor of the public – because being truthful is always in the best interest of the public. Propagandists have no problem lying, with which they make the public angry or even worse,  just stupidify the nation.

We were taught in ethics class, that as a PR practitioner we have to really consider the publics feelings and be polite, and never blunt about situations. It’s important to choose words carefully, because if a PR practitioner messes up even once, he/she will not have any credibility within the rest of the PR practitioners in the country. We have to be respectful and try to overcome, and smooth rough edges softly, and leave the hatch behind. Propaganda has no boundaries as to morality or ethics. Propagandists will say whatever, they will slander whoever they need, in order to get the point accross and to forcefully persuade the audience. No kindness or no politeness is needed in propaganda. And they crazy thing is, that propaganda really works. There of course are a few people who see through that, but masses are what matter in the end, and if masses believe the propagandists then that is it, job done. Brainwashed people are very hard to repersuade. Like even today, still some older people in Estonia believe that the Soviet times were the best times, everybody was happy – a clear example how a propaganda brainwash just doesn’t wash off even after decades

PR in the Medieval Times

Throughout the course of history, the image of kings has always been distortioned  by the next and the next ruler. Everyone wanted to look  better in the eyes of the people.  There were good kings and bad kings, quoting Jones, but it is more or less the opinion of the persons who wrote down the historical cronicles, the people who worked for the king. It was never the worldly opinion  and perception of the king in an international point of view by the people who lived in that time.

In England this is exactly what happened. Kings ruled, died, and the next ruler had all the power to make himself look better than the last king in the eyes of the people of England.  If a king did a good act just once, he could be awed as a “good” ruler, it changed the whole perception of the king. It just takes one good deed in the beginning of the reign to make people think he is a “good” king. After that, whatever the king does, the first impression will stick with the people always – and he will be regarded in the history books as a good king. Then again if a king is said to have been a “bad” one, there is no way of really knowing if that in fact was true, because, again, the next king could have totally demolished the last king’s reputation,  the cronicle writer just rewrites history – and it is done. For exaple King Louis – he was deleted from history, and King Richard III – the perception of him even today is purely based on the writings of Shakespeare, but is in fact far from the truth.

Just like today’s world, so did the past centuries sculpture the images of their people. Public relations has always been here, and is not something that has been made up by the modern people to “sell air”. Even in the medieval times, ideals and ideas were molded for the crowds of people, and at that time it was even more easy to practice PR, because of far less information flow. It was all word-of mouth and what your friend said, you believed. This of course works today aswell, but it is defenitely harder to persuade the public.  In the medieval times Kings’ servants were in charge of making the King look good and telling him his next moves so that the people would trust him and he would look like a “good” King in front of his people. Today it is the same story with kings, queens, presidents, prime-ministers and corporations’ chairmen, who have PR specialists advising them on their next actions and the words that come out of their mouths, to mold the public’s opinion about them.

PR & Rhetoric

PR: the professional maintenance of a favorable public image by a company or other organization or famous person.

Rhetoric: the art of effective persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of  figure speech or other compositional techniques.

Even the ancient Greek philosophers had different ideas  about the persuasion of the people. As much as there are people, as much there are different opinions. Socrates, Giorgas and Plato all believed that in order to persuade people , one does not have to be smart and educated on the subject, only the conviction of the rhetorer is needed.

Aristotle believed that facts need to be presesnted when persuading, but the persuader does not have to be knowledgeable. He said, that in order to make the story sound trustworthy in the ears of the listeners, one just has to tell something that sounds like one doesn’t want everyone to know.

However even the ancient Greek philosophers felt the power of the words of a great rhetoric speaker with the incredible way of persuading as opposed to a weaker one. Speakers like that needed and need to this day to be recognized, because the power of word is stronger than any weapon

Today, in public relations, a rhetorer has to be most of all ethical. Once stepped over the line of ethics, the rhetorer loses face and all credibility in front of the public, and is not trusted or listened to again.  The power of the word was strong and present within the ancient Greeks, as well as today within us.

2 peas in a media pod

Looking back on the media landscape, the two big ones that strike me as landmarks of the past decade are reality tv and social media. Both made a big boom. We found ourselves watching “one” on our living-room wall WHILST conversating about it, using “the other”, in our laps or palms.. Wonder what the next decade will bring…

in Love with iPad

Today the iPad was introduced…
And the photos and introductive videos say more than a thousand words. I am writing this post on a MacBook, which right now seems so old-school. People have been posting discussions and opinions on the iPad all day, some of them praise, some of them mock. I don’t see why any development would be mocked at all? This will defenitely kill out the Kindle and other readers and will redefine for millions of people the meaning of web-browsing and a laptop, for good.

Hello Apple – let me get a bite!

Social Media.. and Marketing

2010 has begun and will most probably be a big year for marketing changes to deepen towards social media. I have had many discussions with people from public relations students to marketing and business students. The latter seem to be devided into two categories: one half is convinced that social marketing is pointless and will not last, and that it doesn’t serve traditional marketing purpose ( they also say that even their marketing professors agree with them). The second half along with PR students and professors find social media to be the new “religion”. And i agree with that. It is a very cost efficient strategy and combining this wiht PR, makes the final impact unreversable. How many people do you know who are not connected daily to a social media network, i not more than one? I can be pretty certain that most of the people you know are in one way or another socialmedia-holics. It is the most efficient tool to reach audiences today, so why can’t the traditional marketing professionals, professors and students step out of their box and face the changes and the new rules of marketing and PR. They might be boycotting social media now, but by the end of 2010 social media has not disappeared anywhere but is evolving and the traditionals will have to swallow their pride and hop on board with the rest of us!

PR Plan – The Body Shop (example)

About the company:

The Body Shop International is a global manufacturer and retailer of naturally inspired, ethically produced beauty and cosmetics products. Founded in the UK in 1976 by Anita Roddick, The Body Shop now has over 2,100 stores in 55 countries, with a range of over 1,200 products, all animal cruelty free, and many with fairly traded natural ingredients.

The Body Shop was the first international cosmetics brand to be awarded the Humane Cosmetics Standard for their Against Animal Testing policy. And they have their own fair trade program called Community Trade, making them the only cosmetics company with such an extensive commitment to trading fairly. Community Trade now works with 31 suppliers in 24 countries, providing over 15,000 people across the globe with essential income to build their futures.

The Body Shop also has their own charity, The Body Shop Foundation. Launched in 1990 (registered charity no. 802757) they give financial support to pioneering, frontline organizations that otherwise have little hope of conventional funding. The Foundation’s focus is to assist those working to achieve progress in the areas of human and civil rights, environmental and animal protection.

All The Body Shop’s products are made with a love of life, respect for the world we live in, a spirit of individuality, and commitment to trading fairly. In a word – passion.

The Body Shop believes that every woman has the right to feel fabulous, so they put their all into finding the highest quality natural ingredients, ethically and responsibly grown and bought, and turning them into innovative products, honestly marketed, and priced so that everyone can afford them.

The Body Shop runs on passion and  five values

Protect the Planet

In 1985, Farm Aid was born from the passion and commitment of Willie Nelson, Neil Young, and John Mellencamp, who wanted to give something back to the rural communities that raised them. Since its beginning, Farm Aid has granted over $15 million to more than 100 farm organizations, churches and service agencies in 44 states. Farm Aid supports the efforts of family farmers who are leading the way in developing environmentally friendly farming methods which will ensure a healthy food supply for future generations. The Body Shop supports Farm Aid because they believe in the future of the American family farm, and they believe hemp is an important part of that future. Family farms are being squeezed out by agribusiness, grocery conglomerates, even the declining demand for tobacco. Every week in the U.S. 500 family farms go out of business; and the rural communities they support follow close behind. Hemp offers American farmers a viable alternative to conventional crops like soybeans to corn, and it’s a great rotation for slumping crops like tobacco because it improves soil quality and crowds out weeds. It grows fast and required little, if any, chemical input because of natural pest resistance.

Support Community Trade

Community Trade is a targeted purchasing program of accessories and natural ingredients from disadvantaged communities around the world. It is The Body Shop commitment to fair trade. The Body Shop gets good quality products at a fair price which covers production, wages and also enables communities to invest in their future. They get a sustained source of income which can be used for improving education or sanitation, building homes and modernizing farming methods, to name but a few. But it is about far more than exchanging goods for money – it is also about the quality of the relationships involved. These trading relationships are based on trust and respect and aim to enable communities to work towards their social and economic goals. The Body Shop Community Trade program all started with Anita in the late 1980’s when she developed trading relationships with local groups she met during her world travels. Now it’s making a world of difference: from some 25 countries, from Australia to Zambia, we trade with over 35 suppliers ranging from Nicaraguan sesame farmers to Indian handicraft producers…

Against Animal Testing

The Body Shop is against animal testing on cosmetic products and ingredients. They do not test our products or ingredients on animals. Nor do they commission others to do so. They never have and never will. The Body Shop takes positive action to bring about an end to the use of animals in cosmetics testing and to ensure no such testing is carried out by us or on our behalf. They operate a strict purchasing rule that ensures that we don’t use any ingredient that has been animal tested for cosmetic purposes by our suppliers since 31 December 1990. They also support and use alternative tests, inform the public and campaign to ban cosmetics tests on animals. Their product labels state clearly that we are ‘Against Animal Test’ (AAT). The Body Shop’s AAT policy and the annual compliance checks we run involving all our suppliers are also subjected to independent review.

Defend Human Rights

Human rights are the fundamental things in life that every person on the planet is entitled to. Social and economic issues as health, housing, employment and the right to an education are as much human rights as the political rights such as free speech and protection from torture. The Body Shop believes that as part of the global community, it is the responsibility of every individual to actively support human rights. Whether it’s signing a petition, using our purchasing power to boycott a company, or lobbying governments, we all have the power to effect change. If enough individuals demand change – big business and governments will have to listen. Businesses have an important part to play in effecting social change. Through having a social conscience and acting with social responsibility, businesses can help create lasting change in society. With over 1,900 outlets around the world The Body Shop has an opportunity to raise awareness amongst millions of people. “Our freedom to do so is underpinned by other more basic freedoms that others have had to fight for. It is right that we support them.”

Activate Self Esteem

Many of Body Shop’s principles are about showing compassion and understanding for other people, but ‘activate self-esteem’ is all about you! Self-esteem is about self-awareness, self-confidence, self-worth, and self-acceptance. It’s about respecting yourself, looking after your body and soul, and being proud of who and what you are. Throughout the ages, women’s bodies have been manipulated to fit the latest fad. They’ve been trussed up, pumped up, corseted and bandaged. Waists have been pinched, skin bleached, ribs removed. The fat sucked out, the silicone injected in. Wouldn’t you rather be measured by your individuality, thinking and lust for life? Stand up for who you really are stand up for self esteem!

The mission statement

The Body Shop Foundation supports innovative global projects working in the areas of human & civil rights and environmental & animal protection. As they say: “We promise to make a difference!”

The Body Shop PR plan will concentrate on women, who care about environmental issues, animal cruelty and making a change in the world.

PR plan according to McGuire’s 12 steps

As the Body Shop has the fundamental identity of being an earthly and natural cosmetics brand, then this message has to be thrown out into the public several times, so the women, who this brand is targeting, become exposed to the message. Nothing happens overnight, so the logo, the message have to become instilled in the back of the women’s mind – in order to do that, they need message exposure. Some women don’t care about environmental issues or that their cosmetics are only made with natural ingredients, so they will not pay attention to these messages, but the ones who do, will pay attention.

Once the woman, interested in environmental issues and animal cruelty, is exposed to the brands message, she will pause to absorb the information in. She might have some personal connection to the issue or like many women, just want to help causes that surround us. Us, women, have a natural nurturing instinct – we want to feel like we are taking care of someone, so if the woman is also about being natural and wants to make a change in the world, she will attend to the message.

Once they have absorbed the information, the message and the brand identity, and they like it, they will become more interested in the issue. It gives a psychological feeling, that this issue, or cause was brought to them, they didn’t have to go out of their way to get to it themselves, and now they have a chance, at that, to be a good human being as well. This concept is very satisfying and rewarding to the human psyche.

Now the women have had multiple rendezvous in their minds with the brands identity and what it stands for, and they are feeling like this is what appeals to them as well. They are becoming more and more comfortable with the topic and are getting more interested in these issues and causes of environment and animal cruelty.

The women are “with the program” and are learning how to think about the issues. They are feeling at home with these problems and causes, and now, when they go to buy a cosmetics product, they will definitely choose the Body Shop, because their opinions and choices are formed already based on these thoughts and self-interest areas of this brand’s mission statement “We promise to make a difference!”.

Now, at this stage, the women will either change the attitudes and opinions they had towards animal cruelty  and environmental issues, or they will be more confident about their choices, because they are more informed and have thought deeper about these issues.

Since they are interested very deeply in the issues, they have done a lot of research online and offline, everything they hear about these issues, they will automatically connect to the Body Shop mission. The information regarding the brands ideas and “religion” is stored in these women’s minds, and the next time they will have to make a choice about a product, they will go to their mind storage, and take out the messages that made a positive and self-interest impact on them, and use it. In this case, they will think of helping the environment and animals, and feel like while buying a product, they are donating some of the money to the causes of her interest area.

After receiving the repetitive messages and they have been stored into the women’s brains, they will be able to retrieve these images, messages, mission and causes they want to be a part of, at any time. These ideas are already instilled in these women by now.

Right before making a purchase, or a decision to make a purchase, the women will make the decision on what to buy according to the causes the Body Shop had previously been installing in them, in favor of buying a Body Shop product. They are now making decisions solely based on these information pieces in their memory storage.

After they have tried the product once, and they like or enjoy it, it is more than likely that they will buy that product again. If the woman, however, finds the product useless, she will definitely not buy it for the second time. And if she found that the Body Shop products were working for her in the past, she will in the future make a decision towards choosing the Body Shop product over any other.

PR plan according to Turney’s 10 questions

Who are the organization’s key target audiences?

Women, who are interested in being good world citizens, helping animals with unfortunate fate, helping the environmental causes that surround us today. It is more important to target women with the same psyche and the same interests rather than divide them into age groups. A 19-yearold girl can have the same worries about endangered species or environmental issues as a 45-yearlold woman. So the PR plan has to probe the psychology and the lifestyles of these women, rather than look at the superficial factors  about them.

Why is this audience important to the organization?

Women as a whole, all around the world, are in their nature, nurturing human beings. From the beginning of time, women were the ones who took care of  the children, and make the surroundings of their home-life livable and warm, comfortable for all, while the males went out to provide food and hunt. This same model applies today as well, only in a slightly different form. The woman wants to feel like she is fulfilling her nurturing needs, and wants to be a good person. She wants to help others out, and it makes them feel accomplished somehow. A man only feels accomplished after he has defeated or risen above other males – he has the most power. A woman has no such need – she feels accomplished by changing things for the better, in their home or, in the case of these particular women, making things better in the world, helping animals and sustaining the environment around us. These women are important, because they are vocal, they stand up for their beliefs and protect their views. Because these issues are in their hearts already, then they go along strongly with the views of the Body Shop. They will feel like they belong, or they have a niche cosmetics product, that they now can use and feel at the same time, that they are helping to make a difference. This gives them more power, and seeing that there are others like them, instills even more these values into their hearts.

What view does the organization want this audience to have of it?

The organization wants its audience to see them as social and environmental activists, helping out communities and the less fortunate in the Third World countries by doing Community Trade.

They strongly point out, that they have never and will never test their products on animals. Their goal is to be seen as “natural” as possible to their costumers. They want to be seen as active and committed in social causes, so that the audience, when using their products, feel like they are also committing and contributing to the social causes of today’s world.

What is this audience’s current view of the organization?

In the organization’s earlier years, even though the products were advertised as “all natural” , theactually weren’t.  The bright colors and strong fragrances were created by chemicals, including from petrochemicals, which were also used as preservatives. They were also not publicized as committed to social causes, which today they are putting a lot of emphasis on. The current view of the organization is that the products sold by this company are natural and no animals were used in testing their products – which is also the organization’s goal.

What issues and appeals are important to this audience?

The social, nature and environmental issues are important to emphasize, because the loyal customer base of this organization likes the fact that they are also helping out and donating. A lot of these women do not find that they have extra money on their hands to donate to charities, but with buying a cosmetics product that we need anyway that puts money towards, e.g. Greenpeace, feels like a charity donation in itself, and it is.

Even though this is a very small contribution that goes towards a charity or a cause with every purchase, it makes the consumer feel, psychologically, like they did something significant.  A persons psyche is selfish – they feel uplifted and important even if they give something small to the needy. This kind of  public relations  and marketing strategy works well for the organization and also the clients. They will feel good and choose the brand again, because they will remember the satisfying feeling the purchase gave them.

Which media does this audience use and trust the most?

Most people are connected to the internet daily, whether they sit in an office, at school or at home. Even if they are on the move, many people now have smart phones that are constantly connected to the internet as well. Using social media networks and online news portals and online women’s magazines would make the organization more visible to more potential customers.

The website www.bodyshop.ee (Estonian site) is very modest and looks like it has not been put a lot of effort into. A website could contain many different charity and donation possibilities, and all updates could be connected with social media networks, which update automatically and are in sync.

These women, being environmental friendly, do not for sure buy subscriptions of newspapers or magazines, but read everything online. Plus, being modern women, they want their information fast. Internet is perfect for distributing the messages to these women.

How does this audience’s current view of the organization differ from the desired one?

The current view in Estonia is that the products are somewhat pricey, but are made of natural ingredients.

The desired view is to be seen as a company that is putting effort into being socially active in Greenpeace, in Community Trade in the Third World, fighting against animal cruelty. As for many Estonians, Greenpeace, Community Trade in Third World countries is very far from them and do not touch them personally.  The PR plan should focus on these areas, and make the Estonian women, who are environmental friendly and fight against animal cruelty, start being involved in the bigger picture.

The consumers who choose The Body Shop products know of the  natural substances used in the cosmetics, but in Estonia, they are not so much aware of the social causes and the contributions the company puts forward. So the desired view of the company is to be understood as a brand who has taken on the whole world to make changes, and that we are all living in the same one world. Estonian people in general are individualistic, and only look and see in front of their own footsteps. These women, who the plan is targeting, being vocal and definitely opinion leaders, will be spreading the word and make other women understand these worldly problems and causes. Make them see, that the pieces and links of this world are connected and working together, and that is how these causes and charities can really make a difference.

What message themes will have the greatest impact on this audience?

Message themes to attract the organization’s audience is  all natural cosmetic substances, going green, being eco-friendly, protecting wildlife, animals.

What are the best ways of reaching this audience?

Best ways to reach this audience is via social media. The audience is a regular social media user, and a daily internet user. Using social media to reach their key audience is also environmental-friendly and a money-saver, since no paper is used for advertisements or public relations.

The USA and the UK Body Shops are already represented on Twitter.com:

http://twitter.com/theBodyShopusa

http://twitter.com/theBodyShopUK

and the USA franchise is represented also on Facebook.com:

http://www.facebook.com/TheBodyShop

The Body Shop of Estonia is not represented on Twitter or any other social media network. It is a great way to get closer to the target audience and make them more aware of the whole Body Shop movement. They can do awareness campaigns, different games and basically melt into the audience’s minds by always being visible.

E.g. Send a Twitter message out, saying: #TheBodyShop.ee : For every RT (re-tweet) sent, we will donate 1eek to the Tallinn’s homeless dog’s shelter.

E.g. Send a Twitter message out, saying: #TheBodyShop.ee: Once we reach 2000 followers, we will draw from our followers a winner of 500eek Body Shop gift card.

Keeping the audience always aware of the organization’s doings, makes the consumer think of The Body Shop, the next time they need a lip-gloss or a body butter.

Who will serve as the organization’s primary contact for working with this audience?

The primary contact for working with this audience, would have to be someone, who is a public figure, an opinion leader, and who is, herself, interested in environmental issues and fighting against animal cruelty. A person who would fit good in this position in Estonia would be Lenna Kuurmaa. She is focused on living a natural lifestyle, being eco-friendly, and she is also popular with younger women as well as grown-ups. She is very humble and is active in many areas of social causes already. Adding the Body Shop mission to her social activities, could make her the Green missionary of Estonia.


Why Do We Need Morality?

The dictionary describes morality as principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong, good and bad behavior.  Our society as a whole has lived by a moral code for many centuries yet we do not really acknowledge the meaning of morality to ourselves. It is rooted in us from the day we are born, but many of us live all their lives never realizing why is it that some things make them feel guilty, or some things need to be lied about, and some things they have to accomplish during the course of their life, to be accepted or accredited on a certain level by the society.

Hobbes gives a great overview on the perspective of morality and on a society without it. If the world lived by the laws of nature, there would be every man for itself, and they would live in a constant fear of death. Nobody would have a sense of helping anther, but every person next to them would be a rival in the world of fight.  If two people are in a quest for the same goal, they become enemies – how far will they go in a world with no moral rules? Probably to death, which would make the society a chaotic one, full of anarchy.

Fortunately, our society is used to having morality. We have a social contract that we live by. Hobbs says, that as long as most of us agree with the social contract and moral rules, the more better off we will all be and the easier our life will go on as a society. Of course some might argue , that these “rules” are chaining us down, and are not giving us total freedom, but these “rules” are only here in order to help the society as a whole, flourish. The rules and regulations, yes, maybe restrict our freedom, but only to an extent and only so people will have much greater freedom and wellbeing.

Pojman brings out a great example of a society without any moral rules in respect of W.Golding’s novel “Lord of the Flies”. At first the children are extremely excited that there are no adults around anylonger to tell them what to do, and they can play on the beach all day long if they want to, and do anything they want for that matter. Soon the older kids start to realise that living this way cannot go on – they start to make rules, they need to have regular meetings where only one can speak at a time, and they have a democratic voting on who they want as their leader. So this “morality” and need for some orderly system in the society is embedded in us from childhood. Of course there are a few renegades in the society who do not obey to those regulations, just as in Golding’s book. This only leads to chaos, death and grief, and no good can come of this – only that everyone sees furthermore how much rules are needed. In a society it is crucial to have them to prevent a large scale “Lord of the Flies” from happening.

A society or a group of people cannot coexist without any moral regulations. We need morality in order to keep our society from falling apart and resolve conflicts in an  orderly fashion. In each of us there is a devil that unleashes whenever there is a conflict of interest or a moral lassitude, but if we do not keep up with the moral conscious inside, we will loose the ground from under our feet quickly and we loose all sense of reality – and become animals living in a world with nature’s rules.